Table of Contents June 23, 2007

By To God Bethe Glory - The scientific ideas of David Jerome Mafille Quarton


After Albert Einstein published his paper on general relativity, he spent the rest of his life trying to find a "unified field theory" when it was almost right under his nose - he had originated

the equation which almost does it, namely, En = mcE02 , where En is the energy, m is the mass, c is the speed of light or 3x10 E08 , and E02 is the square of c, and E08 is its predecessor to the eighth power. Thus 3x10 E08 is 300,000,000 meters per seconds.

But the m of En=mcE02 brings gravity into the equation via F = G mM/rE02 or m = FrE02/GM were F is the gravitational force, r is the distance apart of two bodies, G is the gravitational constant, and M is the mass of the "test" object; while c = ( )E-1/2 where epsilon sub zero is the permittivity of free space or 8.85x 10E-12 and mu sub zero is the permeability of free space or 4( pi)x10E-7. In other words, the epsilon and mu account for the electric field and magnetic field. Then "They" (i.e., modern physicists ) claim they can combine the electromagnetic and weak nuclear fields into the electro-weak field. Further "They"claim that it is possible to combine the electroweak and strong fields into one equation. AND NOW, with the help of Einstein's most famous equation, we can combine all four of the basic forces into one equation!! Pretty simple, right?

Next we must figure out how Einstein's equation works for different kinds of energy: 1) energy of heat; 2) energy of sound; 3) potential energy; 4) lightning and thunder and their interaction with each other; 5) energy of creative thinking; 6) energy of pressure differentials; 7) evaporation; 8) energy of different physical states - such as liquid, solid and gaseous; 9)energies involved in earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes, and tornadoes; 10) energy of playing musical instruments; 11) energy for broadcasting TV and radio; 12) energy of radar; 13) energies of electric and magnetic fields; 14) Gibb's free energy; 15) energies of reactions of all kinds with and/or without sound; 16) entropy and information; 17) energies of floods and/or tides; 18)energies of arguing and laughing; 19) energy of heart beat and flute music targeted towards the heart; 20) energy of seeds sprouting; 21) Rain falling on the earth; 22) energies of motor boats; 23) energies of gravitons; 24) nuclear binding energies; 25) annihilation energies; 26) energy of vehicles - regular and hybrid ; 27) energies of pedaling bikes; 28) energies of storms; 29)energy used in playing sports, dancing, running, jogging,etc.; 30) energies of torques; 31) energies of the metabolism of various living beings; 32) plus more not already mentioned here.

Where, according to the Bible, there are three different substances in all human beings - the physical world, the spiritual world, and the soulwise world. I postulate that the spiritual world is made of negative, imaginary number energy particles and that the soulwise world has something to do with music. Further, I postulate that the entropies of each of the three worlds interact with each other so that - for all "living things" - the second law of thermodynamics doesn't apply - where the physical world entropy is a measure of the disorder of that world.. So, I am providing the evolutionists with an out - yet still I find the creation science case better - the creation science argument against evolution has a big component arguing that the second law of thermodynamics make evolution impossible.

Just a few examples of what research we need in order to put the unified field theory into practice: Do physicists dealing with atomic bombs take account of the phonons (sound quanta) that accompany each explosion - and how to calculate (with exact numbers) the sound from an atomic bomb? Is there an equation which gives a relationship between the electrical discharge involved in lightning and the decibels of the thunder? Further, I strongly suspect that each different species of energy is different in a basic way from any other.

The Michelson-Morley Experiment

"When we speak of light waves traveling through space, precisely what do we mean? If space is empty, there is nothing to vibrate back and forth, and so the concept of a wave moving trough empty space is not easy to accept. In the 19th century, physicists avoided the problem by assuming that the universe is pervaded with a curious fluid called ether whose only property is an ability to support electromagnetic waves. This seems a harmless enough idea, but it contains an implication that led directly to its downfall and thereby to the theory of relativity. (Modern Physics, Arthur Beiser, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Menlo Park, California, 1968, p.24ff) The results of the Michelson-Morley experiment were startling; although their apparatus was capable of measuring the minute time difference expected, none was performed at different seasons and in different locations, and when different experiments were tried for the same purpose, the conclusions were always identical - no motion through the ether could be detected".

So Einstein came up with the idea that there was NO ether. BUT THERE is another possibility - namely that there is an ether but it is at rest with respect to the earth. AND there is "good" evidence that there IS an ether; just that it is called something else, namely vacuum or virtual space. For, if I remember right, P.A.M .Dirac postulated that the vacuum is a flux or sea of negative-energy particles.

Isaiah 40:17 says (NAS), "All the nations are as nothing before Him, They are regarded by Him as less than nothing and meaningless." Depending on your authority, this was written anywhere from the early 700s to the late 400s. Was Isaiah a mathematician? As far as I know the mathematical concept of negative numbers was from the late Dark Ages and the mathematical concept of a number that is zero is even earlier. Yet, P.A.M. Dirac's vacuum for every atom is probably about 10,000 times in volume compared the electrons and neutrons. That means that there could be 10,000 times of volume of negative particles per amount of volume of positive particles.

Ecclesiastes 1:6 says ( NAS), "Blowing toward the south, Then turning toward the north, The wind continues swirling along; And on its circular courses the wind returns" Thee are about three other verses in the Old Testament that essentially say te same thing. What I need to know is whether these verses are describing a circle or a sphere - as well the geometric sophistication of the author.

Leviticus 26:19 says (NAS)," I will also make your sky like iron and your earth like bronze." I don't remember exactly but sometime in the history of ether, various physicists calculated that it would have to be very hard - perhaps as hard as iron as this verse of the Bible predicts. Further, various verses of the Bible, namely, Jeremiah 10:13, Job 38:25, and Psalm 135:7 all imply or come right out and say that the atmosphere also is hard and that lightning makes rivulets or channels for the rain to fall.

Psalm 90:4 (NAS) says, " For a thousand years in Thy sight Are like yesterday when it passes by, Or as a watch in the night. " Since there were three watches in the night in Old Testament times ( Four watches in the night in Jesus time), this means that a day to God is 6000 years for mankind. Again, 2 Peter 3:8 (NAS) says, "But do not let this one fact escape your notice, beloved, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day."

Genesis 2:6 (NAS) says, "But a mist used to rise from the earth and water the whole surface of the ground." In other words, the antediluvian drops of water in the atmosphere were so small in dimensions that rainbows couldn't form : whereas, with the change in the values of physics constants at the Flood rainbows were seen after the Flood and were the signs of God's covenant that there would never again be a Flood.

Genesis 5 gives the ages of the patriarchs before the Flood: a) Adam - 930 years; b) Seth - 912years; c) Enosh - 905 years; d) Kenan - 910 years; e)Mahalalel - 895 years; f) Jared - 962 years; ( Enoch is next but he was taken by God without dying); g)Methuselah - 969 years; h) Lamech - 777 years: for an average of 908 years Yet, again, Moses in Psalm 90 says that men in his time lived to be about 70 years old. So we have some numbers from the Bible with which to work on. And the changes in physics constants causing these phenomena are probably all based on the changes in God and/or mans clocks.

We know more from the Bible about the change in values of physics constants at the Flood - an indication that there wasn't any radioactivity before the Flood. For after the Flood Noah planted a vineyard and drank of it and got drunk. Yet the Bible calls Noah "righteous in his generation".The only possible explanation I can come up with is that the fermentation of antediluvian grape juice by yeasts converted to carbon dioxide as in soda pop, while the fermentation of yeasts after the Flood was to alcohol, AND Noah had no way of knowing that his grape pop would become wine. In other words, radioactive carbon 14 decayed to nitrogen in the grape yeasts DNA, changing the nucleic acids in formula, weight, and valence of individual atoms. Thus the main reason for non-accidental death in humans after the Flood would be the radioactive decay of Carbon atoms.

Then there's the matter of transmutation - like the alchemists of old looking to change mercury into gold - But Jesus used transmutation of elements in the fish and bread as well as of the air near this food to feed, first 4000 and then 5000 (plus women and children) as well as to change the elements of disease to elements of health in those who He healed. Further, with the possibility of changing the values of physics constants, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego could have come out of the burning cauldron without a trace of burning and/or smoke on their clothes and/ or bodies. Again, with the change in the value of the gravitational constant the axe in Elisha time could have floated on the top of the river whereas - especially the axe head - sank to the bottom before that miracle.

At this era of global warming, it is very important to notice that the Bible says that, in the end times, the sun and the moon will be 7 times brighter. Further, with the possibility of changing the gravitational constant we can solve a very-long standing problem in astronomy, namely, the mystery of the dark matter.

End of June 23, 2007

Beginning July 14, 2007

After1915 and Einstein's papers on relativity, he dedicated his life to trying to come up with a unified field theory. He had many years to live before he died and could not have been aware of the strong and weak nuclear forces. Now "they" say that "they" are able to combine the weak and strong nuclear forces with the electromagnetic forces. So "they" only have to realize that his most famous equation, E=mc*2 where c*2 is the speed of light squared, m is mass and E is energy, combines the four forces, i.e., begins the process of developing an unified field theory. However, I think that Einstein would not be satisfied with E=mc*2 alone unless there is some way to develop separate equations for the strong force and the weak force that can fit with E=mc*2 in some creative way like saying that the m (mass) of E=mc*2 can allow the gravitational force through F= GmM/R*2 - or m=FR*2/GM -where G is the gravitational constant, R is the distance, and F is the gravitational force - and brings in the speed of light through the electromagnetic constants in their relationship with the speed of light, where c*2= 1/epsilon zero times mu zero.

The sun standing still for a day for Joshua IS possible with the possibility of changes in the physics constants in the Solar System. First I was able to postulate that when the comet that caused the sun standing still came close enough, the earth's tidal bulge was enough to provide a torque to make the sun stand still - I can't find this calculation right now. Next is another process for which I can't find the details: the electrical charge of the earth and the comet. The noted scientist Carl Sagan, in the book, Scientists Confront Velikovsy, quotes Sagan as saying that, as bad as it is in trying to come up with a mechanism for the sun standing still, it is even harder to postulate a mechanism for the earth to start up rotating again. Yet I say that no later than 1983 I postulated that the earth's outer core was liquid and the inner core solid so that it was possible for the earth's crust and mantle to stop rotating while the angular momentum was transferred to the inner core - like an ice skater speeds up his/her rotation speed when he brings his/her arms into close contact with his/her body. If I remember right, this possibility was first realized by a scientist sometime after I came up with it. And when the comet passed, the angular momentum transferred again to the mantle and crust. Whatever, no matter how much I criticize Sagan, he must have been a wonderful man. For he got the U.S.'s most prestigeous scientific organization to have a session on Velikovskianism, even though he personally thought Velikovsky was wrong. Only the true scientists can stake their scientific reputation in such a way. Whatever, there is still another biblical event on the earth's rotation in King Hezekiah's time, when the sun went back 10 degrees before starting again

Isaiah 30:26 says, "And the light of the Moon will be as the light of the sun, and the light of the sun will be seven times brighter, like the light of seven days, on the day te LORD binds up the fracture of His people and heals the bruise He has inflicted. " Talk about global warming. Yet this can be easily explained. Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere by Barbaa J. Finlayson-Pitts and James N. Pitts, Jr. pp.6 and 7, says "It was first suggested in the 1950's that NO was thermally oxidizd by O-sub 2:

2NO + O-sub 2 arrow 2NO- sub-2 (9)

Indeed, in the laboratory, at Torr concentrations, the clear, colorless NO is oxidized in air virtually instantaneously to dark, red-brown NO-sub2."

"In summary, NO is now known to be converted to NO-sub2 during daylight hours , in a reaction sequence initiated by OH attack on organics, and involving HO-sub2 and RO-sub 2 free radicals. These peroxy radicals are the species that actually convert NO to NO-sub2 at ambient concentrations where the thermal oxidation of NO by O-sub2 is negligible."

Meanwhile, the albedo for a body with light shining on it is the fraction of incident light diffusely reflected from a surface. Some typical values are: fresh sow 0.8 to 0,9; fields and woods 0.02 to 0.15; mean for the whole earth 0.4.... The Penguin Dictionary of Physics, Valerie Illingworth, 1991, Penguin Books. My question is how does mankind's actions affect things like the production of dark, red-brown NO-sub2 to an extent that it changes the earth's albedo

from 0.4 by the Bible's 7 times to 0.057? And how do we come up with what the Bible claims, namely, that when the Moon is brightened by 7 times it will be as bright as the sun is today? Further, how does the Bible know that when the Sun gets 7 times brighter, then the Sun will be 7 times brighter? My personal feeling is that the Flood happened in the following way - as humans on the earth in antedilvian times got more and more corrupt and pushed toward disobeying God more and more, at least one thing that happened is that they created a greenhouse situation by using up fuels like wood with the Bible's firmament at the altitude where the atmosphere's temperature allowed it where the firmament was an immense, beautiful stoney-metal framework with "windows" of ice and with at lest a couple of miles of water above the "window panes". So they melted the "ice windows" and the water "above the firmament " - as the Bible puts it - fell on earth. Also, as the Bible puts it, the "fountains of the deep" broke forth.

As I have pointed out, the phenomenon of transmutation - of which Jesus was the master - allowed Him to feed 4000 - with women and children and, again 5000 with women and children, from a few fish and loaves of bread. In other words, the ability to change the values of physics constants allowed Jesus to make 10 atoms more of, say, fish from every single atom - as well as some of the atoms of the atmosphere nearby the fish from nitrogen, water, etc. into fish atoms. Thus Jesus was trying out His ability to feed and quaff all those - throughout history - who would partake of Communion and/or Mass. Further, with the ability to control the transmutation Jesus was able to change atoms and molecules of disease to atoms and molecules of good health.

Further, I think it would be very symmetrical for the mechanism for the Flood would also bring the end times into consideration. Before the Flood, I surmise that there was no rain but that "a mist went up from the face of the ground. Thus the antediluvian situation of small-sized drops of water in the air rather than rain meant that before the Flood the drops of water in the air were not able to allow rainbows to form. And it is going to happen with the disaster by fire at the end times that there will again be a somewhat like the antediluvian situation with no oceans or seas on earth. If this were not so ,there would not be enough dry land on earth to support all the people in history. Again, there is something soothing about the layer of the atmosphere from whence came the Flood would be the same and/or a nearby layer of the atmosphere of the end times - Not that I want this disaster, but, as far as I know, it is inevitable and I want to work towards helping at least 100 milion to be saved - and I figure that a part of their salvation is accepting the inevitable and as well as that God wants to save things as well make a new and wonderful creation after the end times.

Psalm 90:4 says, ( this Psalm ws written by Moses) "For a thousand years in thy sight Are like yesterday when it passes by, Or as a watch in the night." Peter says twice in one of his letters that a thousand years are like a day to God. Put these two together and we get that 1000 years areslike a day after the Flood but it takes ( 6 watches perr dayand/or night ) 6000 years to be equto God's one day. Thus one can explain how much older men lived before the Flood. And whatever the Bile says in te way of lengths of time ad other nubrs, will turn out to be ALL we need, in conjunction with pure logic, to be able to understand ALL physics.

07/14/2007

08/11/07 From the pen of the WUESCraM (Weak, Unworthy, Educated but Sinful, Crazy Man)

It’s very interesting that Matthew 14:25 says there are four watches in the night, whereas Judges 7:19 implies that there are 3 watches in the night - "So Gideon and the hundred men who were with him came to the outskirts of the camp at the beginning of the middle watch,...."If there was a middle watch in the night that implies that there were three watches in the night. All of which means that there was a change in the most basic physics constants - via a change in the universal clocks - between when the scribes wrote Judges 7:19 and Jesus’ time.

II Peter 3:7,10,11-13 says, "But the present heavens and earth by His word are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.....But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, in which the heavens will pass away with a roar and the elements will be destroyed with intense heat, and the earth and its works will be burned up....Since all these things are to be destroyed in this way, what sort of people ought you to be in holy conduct and godliness, looking for and hastening the coming of the day of God, on account of which the heavens will be destroyed by burning, and the elements will melt with intense heat.... But according to His promise we are looking for new heavens and a new earth, in which righteousness dwells." First of all these verses mak it sound like the new heavens and earth will have a physics in which it is impossible to have unrighteousness. Next I need to point out that other versions of the Bible say something like that there will be a loud noise - rather than a roar - ushering in the day of the Lord. Putting together the verses of the Isaiah which say that, at the day of the Lord, the sun and moon will be 7 times brighter along with these verses from II Peter 3, and you get that the sun and moon being 7 times brighter happens as a prelude to the physics events that cause the heat and fire that usher in the new heavens and earth.

Revelation 6:14 says - at the day of the Lord - "And the sky was split apart like a scroll when it is rolled up; and every mountain and island were moved and island were moved out of their places." Then there was the time when it was like God said that the way He created the heavens was comical! And if we knew exactly how the universe is like a scroll we would know the TRUE structure of the universe.

Thanks to the goodness and urging of Carl Sagan, "....the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in 1974, scientists as a group responded to Velikovsky’s exoheretical challenge for the first time"( Scientists Confront Velikovsky, Donald Goldsmith, editor, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1977, p. 15). From Sagan’s article in this book, "It is even more likely that it would have been entirely reduced to a rain of self-gravitating small dust particles and atoms, which does not describe the planet Venus particularly well. The likelihood of a planet, much less an icy comet, surviving ejection seems small. (Incidentally, this would appear to be a good Velikovskian argument for the high temoerature of the surface of Venus; but, as described below, this is not the argument.)"

Bur the Columbia space shuttle burnt up in reentry February 1, 2003, simply because it lost some of its heat shield tiles yet, when all these tiles are in position, it barely gets singed. Certainly God has many different ways to protect the comet/planet Venus from the friction heat of its going through Jupiter’s atmosphere.

According to modern physicists, the electromagnetic particle is the conveyor of the electromagnetic force. Yet HOW does the emitting atom know in which direction the photon has to go in order to reach its target? Just think how many photons must be emitted in order to cover all targets subtending at least 5 second angles at a distance of 10 *-6 meters. NO WAY, NO WAY. Yet this mistaken idea is one of the most important bases of modern physics.

07/14/2007