CAUTION! Keep children’s eyes away from this.
"Mohammad II Pgs 9-15 "
Mohammad II Pgs 9-13 Top of Page
For David says, Psalm 23:4, "Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil; for Thou art with me;"
This country, the U.S.A., outlaws polygamy whereas the practice of having at least 3 wives is part of the Muslim religion. According to the U.S.A. Constitution there is freedom of religion in this country. Thus all Muslims who live in the U. S. A. as well as all U.S.A. Mormons - a sect of Christianity, some of whom believe in polygamy - should file a class action against the U.S.A. government for its denying them their freedom of religion. AS FAR AS I’m concerned one who has priapism ( persistent erection) and/or one who has a rod with 2 or more branches ( so that he can have sexual intercourse with two or more wives at the same time) would have the best case against the government.
I have talked about this with some Muslims and they said that legal immigrants to the U.S.A. are allowed to bring ONLY one of their three or more wives to this country. How can we be more prejudicial to the Muslim world? How can we live with ourselves and be so hypocritical and hurtful to Muslims? Of course, some Muslims practice polygamy on the sly as so don’t some Mormons, but they live with a sword over their head.
Other incidents of the U.S.A. government breaking its commitment to freedom of religion are: 1) public nudity that is mandated by God; 2) legality of marriage when the young lady involved is only 12 or 13; 3) a legal system that is fairer - maybe we can try something like the Old Testament type of justice, minus things like the "eye for eye" and its corresponding spirit of vengefulness and unreasonableness; 4) a public health system that wouldn’t take the baby Jesus away from Joseph and Mary.
As for 1), Isaiah 20:2-5 details Isaiah’s going naked for 3 years as a sign to Egypt and Cush that they are naked before God. Further, if I remember right, one of the Minor Prophets of the Bible also went naked for awhile at God’s command. Then there are some of the different times when King Saul went naked - as did the prophets at that time - such as 1 Samuel 19:24.
Then, as far as I know, the country of India allows some of its holy men to go nude in public and would treat Isaiah’s nudity with tolerance whereas, Isaiah would be put in jail or a mental hospital for indecent exposure in the U.S..
2) If I remember right, the Roman Catholic Church thinks the Virgin Mary was 12 or 13 years old at her conception of Jesus. Further, they think her husband Joseph was an older man. On the other hand, I once came across a Pseudepigraph about Mary that had her living in the temple until her 16th birthday and soon thereafter was her conception. As far as I know, the Hare Krishnas - one of the most popular sects of Hindu religion - believe his final reincarnation begins with that spirit’s human body being 5 or 6 years old and marrying a 5 or 6 year old girl. I try to be tolerant of everyone’s religious beliefs, but this is just about too much. What with so many child sex abusers in this sick young country of ours, I just can’t "go along with" the morals of a given country that would promote marriage for 5 or 6 year olds. Just one example of India’s problems is documented in the movie "Water" which is about widows in India.
I love the Bible so much that I would like to see many of its major agendas that are reasonable put into effect. However, I don’t operate like most Bible critics. I find things wrong with God as well as with Moses and David and Elijah and Jesus. For example, my criticism of Jesus includes: A) Probably the biggest and worst social custom of His times was slavery. Further, Isaiah ( I can’t remember the chapter and verse) talks about slaves for the true Jews in the end times. Jesus should have noted that and come right out with it. He would not have allowed anybody who had slaves to be a Christian; nor could any slave be a true follower who didn’t work his/her best to get free; and everybody should know that slavery is forbidden; B) Jesus should have had at least six of His twelve disciples to be women - and Jesus should have said that Moses was wrong in not allowing women to be priests; further, Paul’s diatribes against wives not being able to talk in church and/or women having to wear hats in church would never have happened; The fact that there were twelve tribes - all the sons of Jacob - demanding all males for His Twelve disciples isn’t any excuse; C) Jesus should never have made wine at the marriage at Cana - it set the stage for the Church to use wine for Communion and also partially led to all the people killed in automobile accidents since the beginning of automobiles as well as millions of drunkards throughout history; D) Jesus should have set an example by doing exercising (almost) every day; E) Jesus should never have cursed the fig tree because it was not harvest time for figs when He told the tree to give Him something to eat; the fact that at least one myth talks about the first war being between the upland bananas and the lowland bananas - which means that He needed to be on the good side of all trees (and animals) in order to accomplish a lasting peace; F) Jesus should not have spoken about rabbis being free of guilt about the Sabbath law by their service at the synagogues on Saturday, which would break the Sabbath law; For the early Christian Church also broke the Sabbath at Jesus’ orders, and celebrated the Jewish Sabbath with rabbis and singers working at their synagogues, AND it wasn’t until Emperor Constantine that the Christian Sabbath became Sunday. Thus Constantine did Christianity a favor so that they could keep Saturday for rest and Sundays for celebration G) Jesus should have worked at planting and taking care of the seeded fruit trees so that He could have all the necessary kinds of seeded fruit to eat, which would allow Him that diet; H) Jesus should have had some blacks (Abishag was a black,i.e., a Shunnamite) and maybe even an Asian amongst His disciples. IN other words, in Jesus’time there were black Jews.
3) The Old Testament never has the word "lawyer" in it. Further, the Old Testament judicial system has judges being appointed ( by the top judges at the time, like Moses, Joshua, Samuel,etc.?) So that there is a judge for every 10,50,100, 500, etc. of the Israelites. Under this judicial system it seems that everybody is innocent until proven guilty for nobody can be found guilty without the testimony of 2 or more witnesses. Of course, the U.S.A. system is very discriminatory for there seems to me - in my 5 experiences with it, each time the charges were dropped - to be a larger percent population of Native Americans, blacks, and poor whites than that percent of those not in jail. (I don’t remember if there was an uneven percentage of Hispanics in Jail). Further, I ask you to consult the former governor of Illinois about the high percentage of those on death row in Illinois who are really innocent YET he personally favors capitol punishment. Finally, Jesus said, "Judge not that you be not judged."(Matthew 7:1) I don’t know, at this time, any way to develop a functioning legal system without judges, but I agree with Jesus that if we work hard enough we can find a way. With the Old Testament system, most of the time the only thing the judges do is to decide the punishment ( with many specifics provided by the Old Testament text itself )- although they, not too often, must decide who’s telling the truth when two or more witnesses disagree with each other.
4) What would the Public Health authorities do to Mary and Joseph for their allowing Jesus’ birth in a room with animals and animals’ droppings? At least the way the U.S.A. treats people now the chances are that the baby Jesus would be taken away from them.
According to an external voice I call God, about 4 or 5 times in my past He got me to go nude in public because that was the least harmful way of helping me in the situations I found myself.
So I have mentioned at least four different subjects where our fellow Americans are having their freedom of religion trampled on by the U.S.A. government. And some of these causes need to be enacted if Christians, Muslims, and Jews can live with the same rights as the people of the Bible. As it is now, NO Way could the Bible have been written in the U.S.A. of today.
Many might argue that a society as permissive as that I’m arguing for would be too permissive and would cause a higher crime rate. But, in spite of my embarrassment at going naked, I believe that ultimately that going by the Bible does nothing but good over a long enough time line.- although there might be many glitches along the way. As far as I’m concerned, I’m doing my country a favor by advocating these changes.
Many Muslims seem to like to call the U.S.A. THE Great Satan. In Matthew 16:23, Jesus said to Peter, "Get behind Me Satan! You are a stumbling block to Me, for you are not setting your mind on God’s interests, but man’s" I interpret this to mean that Jesus - in this statement - was assigning Satan to Peter for Peter to overcome. Jesus says further to Peter in Luke 22:31-32, ""Simon, Simon, behold Satan has demanded permission to sift you like wheat; but I have prayed for you, that your faith may not fail; and you, when once you have turned again, strengthen your brothers. " If Peter came to me - a citizen of the U.S.A. - back in 1966, then according to scriptures - Daniel 9:26 - , Peter’s people - the citizens of the U.S.A. - would be the people that caused the abomination which makes desolate via the U.S.A. manned mission to the Moon. But after some Americans realize the corruption we have caused and decide to help me - as Peter - in my disagreement with Satan,. That would make the U.S.A. (The country of ) THE Great Satan, and the Muslims of the world - other than those of the U.S.A. - are contributing to all humanity in this spat against Satan the necessary insight the U.S.A. needs by calling the U. S.A. THE Great Satan. Peter is pleading with all religions and religious leaders to help him in this attempt to overcome Satan and Satan’ angels. In a certain way, being called THE Great Satan is a compliment for what other country would be willing to do so? AND we should be very thankful to all Muslims for the insight they provide in calling the U.S.A. THE Great Satan. Further, if I am truly Peter, then "my" people of Daniel where Daniel talks about the abomination which makes desolate would be all the Roman Catholic Church members as well as the citizens of the U.S.A.
Many like to argue that since "the times" when the Bible was written, "the times" when Jesus lived on earth, and "the times" of today are so different that NO WAY can the Bible be twisted to be applicable to nowadays. However, I really believe that whatever God says or does has something of eternity about it. As Psalm 55:19 says, "God .... With whom there is no change," So that if Jesus was born of a 12 or 13 year old virgin, God would like Jesus - in His second coming - to be an offspring of a teenage virgin. AND, in some ways, it’s the "evilness" of "polite" U.S.A. society that will make it so hard for Jesus to duplicate His original birth situations. Whatever, the God of the Bible - in my outlook on things - knows (for sure) what is best for us and ALL His creation - as well how much leeway the present times allow, where that leeway is a sign of the "evilness of polite society".
As to the universality of the Bible, the book of Ezekiel makes it very clear that usury is poisonous. Anybody with a passion for economics knows that if one starts with a "stable" economy without usury and then adds usury, prices have to rise in order to give business people who are creditors the added money to cover this usury. That means inflation, i.e., printing up new money. Further, many of those just starting a business might not be able to pay the interest as well as the principle of a loan - and thus have to file for Bankruptcy. Whereas the ones putting out the capitol - the "rich" - just get richer as long as most of the start-ups are able to survive while paying interest. The "poor" in this case are the creditors who couldn’t pay the interest, and lost all their savings as well as their business. Thus the rich get richer and the poor get poorer..
Why don’t our leaders see it? Our country’s motto on U.S.A. currency is "In God we trust" If that were really so, then the experts of Wall Street should be giving something - to make them lambs - perhaps a tithe of all their net after taxes. "Put your money where your mouth is." Show me a company that gives to charity, etc. but doesn’t pay its employees a liveable wage and I will show you a company that truly worships God by paying its employees a liveable wage, before it even thinks of charitable giving. Those companies that are so motivated should be able to give some to any religious or charitable organization as long as they don’t support violence or war and work towards peace. Thus, one’s economic base should be based on why the Bible is against usury AND the right things to do in order to truly claim the U.S.A. motto. In Matthew 25:27 Jesus tells a parable in which a wealthy person gives three or so people some money and then leaves town. When the wealthy person returns he asks the first person what he made with the money the wealthy person gave him. That person invested wisely and so the wealthy man gave him ten cities. The second person made a lot of money with that loan so the wealthy person gave him five cities. The last person wrapped up the money the wealthy man gave him and saved it. Jesus said that that last person should have at least put the loan in a bank. Thus , in this last matter Jesus endorsed usury. He was wrong. Two wrongs don’t make a right. Deuteronomy 8:18 says, "But you shall remember the LORD your God, for it is He who is giving you power to make wealth...." Further, watch out entrepeneurs, for Proverbs 28:8 says, "( in the end times) He who increases his wealth by interest and usury gathers it for him who is gracious to the poor." Proverbs 8:21 says, "To endow those who love me - i.e., that would include those who don’t use usury - with wealth, That I may fill their treasuries." Also in Deuteronomy Moses talks about those who aren’t able to get to Jerusalem to put their tithe in for three years. He says that, as long as the widows and orphans are taken care of, that tithe is to be spent on a party. Further, so many pastors I know of talk and talk and talk about tithing - even for those who make about the poverty level or less - when the churches should be helping these exact same people - just as the Mormons take care of their own
There are probably many U.S. A. Citizens who will say that they didn’t know this country’s policies indubitably led to the abomination which makes desolate. They just didn’t know what was going on. Of course, I don’t know "for sure"that is what happened, but I do know that God - and God alone - can justify somebody. As far as I know, the ones who were at least 18 years old back then AND who now help get out this word could well be innocent. Other than since my "coming out" in the Winter of 2005, I know only one person who mentioned to me something about the Moon and the New Jerusalem - and this was Harry Newbury in his last days back then in 1980. Back then I had no idea what was going on. Whatever, I instinctively knew that my first duty was to protect that part of Jesus in me as of 1978, and I even refused to use Jesus’ majestic voice inside me to show off. And I’ve insisted that if Jesus in me wants to use this voice while He’s inside of me, then it be His doing and His words.
I might be entirely wrong about my spiritual experiences, but even if I am, how would I feel if they were true and I didn’t let people know? As far as I know, I always try my best and all that is required of anybody is that they try their best.
Mafille - I’d be afraid to take it as my first or last name or my sole name. He seems so powerful and terrible, I’d hate to get on His wrong side. So there happen to be two in this life which could - if they wanted to - give people unbearable pain. Those are the ones to be afraid of, i.e., God the Father/Creator and Mafille. Then there are quite a few "Greats’ in me without whom I would miss their blessings greatly - especially Santa Claus.
Jesus chose to not use (waste?) his penis for sex: thus he didn't masturbate (New American Standard Version I John 3:9 says, "No one who is born of God practices sin, because His seed abides in Him....."), get married, or father children. Jesus was a quick study so if he had only waited until age 55 or so to begin his ministry I think his ministry would have been different . Whatever, Jesus is my candidate for King of Kings. His heart was/is in the right place. Two things that really endear me to Jesus are: 1)He didn’t even dare to try to be like God: He was so humble: He even said that there is "Only one who is good"( Mathew 19:17) - and that one is God; 2) He had a real passion for sinners. In fact, He said He came to save sinners. BUT. BUT. It is still possible to be a pacifist and a sinner at the same time. That’s right, I criticize Jesus for not demanding that ALL His followers be complete pacifists. Whatever, who besides Jesus would of thought of and implemented being crucified for the sins of sinners and then giving these followers eternal life?
I don’t care what Jesus says, what the Holy Spirit says OR what God the Father/Creator says: nobody in their right mind would want to throw anybody -including Satan - into Hell.
Yes, I believe that Mohammad, Jesus, and Moses should have told ALL their followers that they had to be complete pacifists. Further, I want to ask ALL Muslims, Jews, or Christians what they would do without the Bible: the three Abrahamic religions of THE Book should be honoring and praising each other. Many Muslims seem to like to call the U.S.A. THE Great Satan. But I ask for the help of ALL Muslims and Jews for the Christian/ Peter burden in this disagreement with Satan and his angels and the humans that worship Satan.
.Yes, the Roman Catholic Church thinks the Virgin Mary was about 12 or 13 when she was impregnated. And Yes, Mother Nature teaches that one’s first sex should be soon after sexual maturity, which would be about 12 or 13. BUT, there is almost an epidemic nowadays of 6 to 11 year-olders who get physically mature. I attribute this potential disaster to the man-mad chemical pollutants that duplicate puberty in the biosphere.
Perhaps history teaches that the building of the Cape Cod Canal - cutting off the Cape Cod from mainland Massachusetts could have possibly caused the sinking of the Titanic. Cape Cod extends out from the state of Massachusetts into the Atlantic Ocean and looks like a raised right arm on a man who has his back to the observer and which determines the outlines of Cape Cod Bay. According to Denver Public Library, the Reference Desk, on June 22,1909, construction was begun on the Cape Cod Canal. In 1914 the Cape Cod Canal was opened to limited service and was officially opened for full use in 1916. As soon as the warm waters of the Gulf ( of Mexico) Stream flowed in the canal, some of these waters were fed into the Atlantic Ocean from the Cape Cod Bay. Guess what? An iceberg could have - possibly - broken off the Arctic/Greenland icepack at an unusual site for breakage and continuing for its demise much farther south into the normal shipping lanes. This iceberg could have - possibly - struck the passenger Titanic on April 15, 1912. An encyclopedia article on the Gulf Stream says, "In 1844 systematic surveying of the stream was begun by the United Sates Coast and Geodetic Survey. Concentrated modern efforts were inaugurated only in the early 1930s by the ketch Atlantis of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts."
Even though the actual flow of warm water in the Cape Cod Canal could have happened ( the legal beginning of the Cape Cod Canal June 22,1909; limited usage in 1914 and completion in 1916) after the sinking of the Titanic (April 5,1912), the fact that the canal was legally started June 22, 1909 mean that the forces of the "GIM ME’s - at any expense - would be able to melt the iceberg from the North Atlantic ice pack with such a large mass of ice that by the time it got into the shipping lanes it wreaked havoc. So the building of the Cape Code Canal cut off some of the strength of God’s right arm - i.e., some of Jesus’ strength - where the Song of Solomon 8:6 says, "Love is as strong as death."
Jesus suspected what was going to happen and, after the sinking of the Titanic He helped Mother Earth, Mother Nature, the Holy Spirit, and God the Father/Creator get into equilibrium with its ice packs so that no more big icebergs plague the North Atlantic shipping lanes even though Jesus knew He would be vulnerable because of trying to help out. I want to praise Jesus, "Great is the Lord ( That means You, dear Lord and Master) and greatly to be praised."
As Jesus says in Matthew 12:12, "...it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath." And He has the authority to say this (Matthew 12:8) "For the Son of Man (i.e., that is, Jesus himself) is Lord of the Sabbath." And He says in Matthew 12:5, "...on the Sabbath the priests in the temple break the Sabbath, and are innocent." Personally I think Jesus is wrong on His interpretation of rabbis, singers, and musicians at the synagogue on Saturday. Breaking the Sabbath is breaking the Sabbath and there are no excuses.
Further John 5:17 has Jesus saying about His working on the Sabbath, "My Father is working until now, and I Myself am working." Psalm 90 has Moses saying that a thousand years of man’s time is only one day to God. Also Peter’s two books of the Bible say the same thing two more times. So the seventh day - by God’s time - was the creation or first Sabbath. It was - at Jesus’ time - only about 3 of God’s days from the beginning/creation Sabbath. So Jesus was saying that He was on God’s clock. He hadn’t experienced the second sabbath - God’s second sabbath - yet.
As for the one who "changes time" being "evil", Daniel 7:25 says, ‘And he will speak out against the Most High and wear down the saints of the Highest One, and he will intend to make alterations in times and in law;...’ This is why Seventh Day Adventists, Seventh Day Baptists, etc. think Emperor Constantine - in the 330s A.D. - partook of the spirit of the Antichrist because he changed the Christian Sabbath from the Jewish Saturday to the Christian Sunday. BUT......This is just another case of the Bible - apparently and on the surface - contradicting itself. For Daniel 2:20 says, "let the name of God be blessed forever and ever, For wisdom and power belong to Him, "And it is He who changes the times and the epochs...."
The difference between these two verses from Daniel is that Daniel 2:20 refers to "He who changes the times," and Daniel 7:25 has "he who makes alterations in times." The Devil is in the details.
Although it is not completely assured, Moses might well have been one who changed the times. Yet NO WAY is he of the Antichrist - even the two seventh day sects wouldn’t think that. Exodus 12:1 has, "Now the LORD said to Moses and Aaron in the land of Egypt, "This month shall be the beginning of months for you; it is to be the first month of the year to you." This verse from Exodus 12 is talking about the Passover.
I have read at least two different books on Jewish holidays, and, as far as I can understand, the Jews of today have 3 different New Year’s day - one would be Rosh Hashannah, another would be the Passover, and the third I can’t find reference to right now. So could the downgrading of the Passover from being the ONE and ONLY New Year’s have started with Moses?
08-28-06 FINIS
If you’re not a P.M. (Peace Maker) then you’re a P.M. (Problem Maker).
Summary: SOMEBODY( ies) WAS OUT TO s*c*r*e*w* JESUS R O Y A L L Y.
This comes form the pen of the WUESSCRAM
(Weak Unworthy Educated but Stupid Sinful Crazy Man)